<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Osborne Ink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.osborneink.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.osborneink.com</link>
	<description>News that&#039;s fairly liberal, but never unbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:00:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; Not As We Do</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/not-as-we-do.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/not-as-we-do.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MagicLoveHose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kulturkampf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcomix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Jordan Ashby for the heads-up here. We have our own citizenship-renouncing rich shithead in Canada named Conrad Black. Call me quirky, but I view citizenship as a bit more sacred than something you just buy and sell, y&#8217;know?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gunpowder-169.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20916" title="And also, an asshole." src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gunpowder-169.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="480" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Thanks to <a href="http://bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2012/05/an-anti-american-hero.html">Jordan Ashby</a> for the heads-up here.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">We have our own citizenship-renouncing rich shithead in Canada named Conrad Black. Call me quirky, but I view citizenship as a bit more sacred than something you just buy and sell, y&#8217;know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/not-as-we-do.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Nails Marriage Equality</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/obama-nails-marriage-equality.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/obama-nails-marriage-equality.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love having an articulate president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I love having an articulate president.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20925" src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/obamanailsmarriage.jpg" alt="" width="767" height="1361" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/obama-nails-marriage-equality.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Awful: Boehner is Bad at His Job</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-debt-limit-cliff.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-debt-limit-cliff.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morning Awful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barbecue media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At some point, it must become patently clear to the Beltway that John Boehner really is bad at his job. Brian Beutler reports: In remarks at the 2012 Peter G. Peterson Foundation, Boehner will erect the same requirements for raising &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-debt-limit-cliff.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">At some point, it must become patently clear to the Beltway that John Boehner really is bad at his job. Brian Beutler <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/boehner-debt-limit-default-peterson-geithner.php" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In remarks at the 2012 Peter G. Peterson Foundation, Boehner will erect the same requirements for raising the debt limit this coming winter that nearly led the country to default on its debt last August.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“We shouldn’t dread the debt limit. We should welcome it. It’s an action-forcing event in a town that has become infamous for inaction,” Boehner will say according to excerpts of prepared remarks provided by his office.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Step one: inaction. Step two:  sow chaos through action. Step three: complain of inaction. See how that works? But then the president has been pretty frugal with the coffers, so <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/john-boehner-tim-geithner-debt-limit.php" target="_blank">it&#8217;s an empty threat</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Treasury officials note — and Secretary Timothy Geithner made clear Tuesday — that the administration expects to be able to manage its accounts in such a way that the <em>true</em> deadline for raising the debt limit won’t actually come until early next year — after the fiscal cliff on January 1, and possibly after the new Congress is sworn in. Which means it’s unclear if Boehner’s threat has any teeth to it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Not very good at his job, even by the low standards of the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-debt-limit-cliff.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Awful: AZ Fits Big Government for a Womb</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-az-big-government-abortion.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-az-big-government-abortion.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Morning Awful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The War on Women is an ugly phrase for an ugly side of teapublicanism. As I keep saying, the tea tide has been the end stage of Goldwater Republicanism, which has always been dissonant on family planning. In Arizona, a &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-az-big-government-abortion.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The War on Women is an ugly phrase for an ugly side of teapublicanism. As I keep saying, the tea tide has been the end stage of Goldwater Republicanism, which has always been dissonant on family planning. In Arizona, a woman&#8217;s employer now has the right to decide <a href="http://www.teamuterati.com/wiki/tiki-view_tracker_item.php?page=Arizona&amp;itemId=210&amp;show=view" target="_blank">whether female employees deserve family planning</a>. Because religious freedom!</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">In plain English, a woman employed by a &#8220;religiously affiliated&#8221; organization must prove to the insurer that she plans to use birth control pills for purposes other than contraception, abortifacient, abortion, or sterilization purposes, and must bear the cost for offering such proof.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This likely only applies to churches and hospitals and the like, but the language is vague and the bill does not outline how a health insurer or the public could verify the stated religious motivation of the entity. The entity simply submits an affidavit to the health insurer that says &#8220;we are religious!&#8221; Essentially, the health insurer would have to take the organization&#8217;s word for it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">All my life, liberal and conservative women have observed to me that insurance would cover Viagra, but not birth control. This bill is not just an attack on the Affordable Care Act and its associated regulations, which would establish a universal right to contraception in private insurance plans. It actually violates HIPPA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-az-big-government-abortion.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wingnut Wind Power Wankery is Not About Free Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/wingnut-wind-power-wankery-is-not-about-free-markets.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/wingnut-wind-power-wankery-is-not-about-free-markets.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Teabag Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political framing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week at the Guardian, Suzanne Goldenberg reported on an emerging right wing effort to attack the wind energy sector. ALEC, Americans For Prosperity, and a newer outfit called the American Tradition Institute (really!) have been propagandizing against wind power &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/wingnut-wind-power-wankery-is-not-about-free-markets.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20195" src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/powershifter.png" alt="" width="398" height="331" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Last week at the <em>Guardian</em>, Suzanne Goldenberg reported on <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/08/conservative-thinktanks-obama-energy-plans">an emerging right wing effort</a> to attack the wind energy sector. ALEC, Americans For Prosperity, and a newer outfit called the American Tradition Institute (really!) have been propagandizing against wind power since the Obama administration included tax incentives for it in their 2009 stimulus bill. They are now actively organizing local teapublican attack squads to defeat wind farm initiatives.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">None of this is about &#8220;free markets,&#8221; either, as the above chart <a href="http://www.earth-policy.org/data_highlights/2012/highlights27" target="_blank">indicates</a>. It is about the &#8220;traditional&#8221; coal, oil, and gas-driven profit margins of the industrial sponsors of these organizations. It is the same reason we never stop hearing about Solyndra, even with solar power <a href="http://grist.org/list/in-germany-solar-will-be-as-cheap-as-conventional-electricity-by-2013/" target="_blank">becoming just as cheap as any other electricity source</a>. Because God forbid America should host the energy export businesses of the 21st Century, right?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Consumerism is a teapublican American value, while &#8220;sustainable&#8221; has become a curse word. Arizona&#8217;s recent <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/arizona-dons-a-tinfoil-hat.html" target="_blank">legislation</a> outlawing &#8220;Agenda 21&#8243; urban planning initiatives has to be understood in the dim light of Michele Bachmann&#8217;s <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/08/michele-bachmann-light-bulbs-agenda-21" target="_blank">attempt to overturn federal light bulb laws</a> and John Boehner&#8217;s reintroduction of styrofoam to the Congressional cafeteria. All of these initiatives were couched in &#8220;values&#8221; language, making &#8220;renewable&#8221; the new gay marriage.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Again, <a href="http://ivn.us/2012/02/23/congress-fails-to-renew-wind-power-tax-credits/" target="_blank">none of this has anything to do with free markets</a>. It&#8217;s about hippie-bashing:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Congress failed to renew wind power tax credits last week. The effects on the fast-growing wind energy industry are expected to be devastating, including major layoffs and delayed or cancelled projects.  The current income tax credit of 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour of wind power will now expire at the end of 2012. Wind power proponents tried to get an extension added to the payroll tax cut bill but failed. They could try again but another attempt probably won’t happen until after the November elections (when perhaps they hope Congress will be friendlier to renewable energy).</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Meanwhile, wind energy&#8217;s critics <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/226717-mckibben-activists-should-be-willfully-naive-in-oil-subsidy-climate-battle" target="_blank">suffer no interruption in their socialism</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The oil-and-gas and coal-mining industries spent a combined $167 million on lobbying in 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, and are also active in political giving.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The new bill, which sponsors say would end $113 billion in federal support for fossil fuels over a decade, stands almost no chance of passage.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">God forbid America should invent and manufacture these new technologies while there is so much oil and coal left to burn, right? And I use the word <em>god</em> deliberately, because this kind of regressive politics is inherently faith-based. Its proselytizers profess a faith in unlimited supplies of cheap oil and coal to maintain the civilization of a now-golden memory. A newer, greener era of renewable sustainability is their hell.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And it makes sense, because this particular brand of politics has always been financed by the fossil fuel sector. Examples could fill an entire blog post, but two &#8212; the Koch brothers and Don Blankenship &#8212; can stand for the rest. An America with burgeoning renewable power industries actually <em>is</em> their hell.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Adding:</em> Karoli <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/right-wing-group-plans-strategy-smear-wind-" target="_blank">wrote a great rundown on the astroturfing plan last week</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/wingnut-wind-power-wankery-is-not-about-free-markets.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Clarke Schools Bill Maher on Why It Matters Whom You Elect President</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/richard-clarke-schools-bill-maher-on-why-it-matters-whom-you-elect-president.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/richard-clarke-schools-bill-maher-on-why-it-matters-whom-you-elect-president.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 17:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emilia1956</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bill Maher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="600" height="335" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DhFK1V3kd44" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="335" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/l0n8uLMu4iM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/richard-clarke-schools-bill-maher-on-why-it-matters-whom-you-elect-president.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Age of Uncertainty: the Colonial Idea</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/age-of-uncertainty-the-colonial-idea.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/age-of-uncertainty-the-colonial-idea.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cold War Memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Afternoon TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This episode of John Kenneth Galbraith&#8217;s 1977 BBC series is probably the best examination of colonialism in broadcast television history. If anything, the age of globalization has merely intensified the issues examined herein &#8212; which is strange, because Galbraith was &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/age-of-uncertainty-the-colonial-idea.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">This episode of John Kenneth Galbraith&#8217;s 1977 BBC series is probably the best examination of colonialism in broadcast television history. If anything, the age of globalization has merely intensified the issues examined herein &#8212; which is strange, because Galbraith was speaking in a Cold War world. Galbraith&#8217;s observations about the Soviet experience with global power proved prescient when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan two years later.</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="437" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0CFY7_WHuUc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/age-of-uncertainty-the-colonial-idea.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Democratic Party Marijuana Evolution</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/marijuana-evolution.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/marijuana-evolution.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kulturkampf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same week President Obama &#8220;evolved&#8221; out of the gay marriage closet, congressional Democrats tried to evolve federal medical marijuana laws with a bipartisan amendment: None of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/marijuana-evolution.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/WeedEvolutionChart.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20867" title="WeedEvolutionChart" src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/WeedEvolutionChart.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="362" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The same week President Obama &#8220;evolved&#8221; out of the gay marriage closet, congressional Democrats tried to evolve federal medical marijuana laws <a href="http://www.montereyherald.com/local/ci_20597211/farr-comes-defense-medical-marijuana">with a bipartisan amendment</a>:</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;"><p>None of the funds made available in this Act to the Department of Justice may be used, with respect to the States of Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, to prevent such States from implementing their own State laws that authorize the use, distribution, possession, or cultivation of medical marijuana.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Republicans voted overwhelmingly against the bill. <a href="http://www.opposingviews.com/i/politics/2012-election/democrats-seek-end-federal-intervention-medical-marijuana" target="_blank">Democrats were in favor</a>. But both parties are the same, etc. I&#8217;m also sure someone will remind me how awful President Obama has been on medical marijuana, but as I keep saying there is actually not much he can do to change the laws; that requires Congress.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The real question is whether party and potheads can come together &#8212; never mind the president. Medical marijuana has popular bipartisan support, and it&#8217;s a particularly potent youth issue. Meanwhile, Democrats have a huge brand problem. Ask ten Democrats what their party stands for, and they will have ten responses. Democrats have tried to hold the center by &#8220;hippie punching&#8221; on progressive issues, and there is no more visibly &#8220;hippie&#8221; issue than marijuana.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I have said before that the key to understanding marijuana politics is that cannabis culture is exactly that, a culture. As comedian Jimmy Kimmel recently reminded the president at the Correspondents&#8217; Dinner, cultures respond to pressure, usually in the negative. Marijuana culture has suffered official repression in the United States for decades; it is not going away. Democrats should consider the possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/marijuana-evolution.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Awful: Closet Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-romney-is-weak.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-romney-is-weak.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Awful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[False compassion is always dissonant. Mitt Romney says same-sex couples should be allowed to adopt children, but they should not be married. See, the important thing is that every child be raised by one man and one woman, even if &#8230; <a href="http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-romney-is-weak.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-20872" src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/mittwife.jpg" alt="" width="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">False compassion is always dissonant. Mitt Romney says same-sex couples should be allowed to adopt children, but they should not be married. See, the important thing is that every child be raised by one man and one woman, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57432292-503544/romney-says-hes-fine-with-gay-couples-adopting-children/" target="_blank">even if their marriage is a sham</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In his most detailed comments to date on the issue of civil rights for gay people, Romney told Fox News television host Neil Cavuto, &#8220;I know many gay couples that are able to adopt children. That&#8217;s fine. But my preference is that we &#8230; continue to define marriage as the relationship between man and a women.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Living the lie is important, kids! And Willard has long experience enforcing the lie. In high school, Mr. Lord of the Flies <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/10/481817/mitt-romney-outed-as-anti-gay-high-school-bully/" target="_blank">had other people hold someone down while he assaulted them with scissors</a> for a heteronormative haircut. He&#8217;s the perfect candidate for the last stand of militant homophobia: <em>Adam and Steve had better get back in the closet, no matter how fabulous they look, or there&#8217;ll be trouble</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/morning-awful-romney-is-weak.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Big Thank You</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/a-big-thank-you.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/a-big-thank-you.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MagicLoveHose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kulturkampf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Webcomix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=20861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He raised a million dollars in the ninety minutes after the announcement. I think he&#8217;s going to be okay.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gunpowder-168.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-20862" title="Picture tweeted by Ezra Klein. It is a Photoshop and Barack Obama does not actually have rainbow-based superpowers. We feel the need to mention this." src="http://www.osborneink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gunpowder-168.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>He raised a million dollars in the ninety minutes after the announcement. I think he&#8217;s going to be okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.osborneink.com/2012/05/a-big-thank-you.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.266 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-17 03:56:09 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
