Andrew Breitbart, serial fabricator, had an anonymous source post some suggestive pics that had been tweeted out of New York Representative Anthony Weiner’s account while it was hacked. You can read more at Gawker, where the myth of Andrew Breitbart’s savvy self-marketing continues. He’s slick, but he’s not smart — and his noise is not news. It’s propaganda, and it only makes sense as desperate attention-grabbing. My question is whether the hack was related to the disclosure, in which case he may have graduated from fabrication much as a serial killer moves up from torturing animals. He’s developed a taste for this sort of thing.

During the March 18 airing of his television program, for example, Beck ran a portion of video created by a Chicago-based blogger who calls himself Rebel Pundit. The blogger, who does not publicly reveal his name, says he was initially pleased to see Beck running his video, which featured left-wing protesters demanding amnesty for illegal immigrants. He was soon shocked, however, to see that Beck’s staff had obscured the watermark logo of his website, RebelPundit.com, from the tape.

“I put my website name on there for a reason – to bring people from the movement to my website so they can see the other stuff that I’ve done,” the man behind Rebel Pundit told TheDC. “You’ve got pretty much the biggest guy in the movement take your stuff and actually have his editors spend the time to scrub my name off of it.”

Remember that time Beck tried to make a Kansas City Junior High School step-dance troupe into an Obama goon army? Yeah, that YouTube’r didn’t get credited, either — which is no surprise, since Beck’s staff apparently failed to look at the notes on the post that gave the school’s location: “what is this?” Beck intoned with mysterious malice. “We’ve been trying to figure this out for weeks, but they’ve sealed it up as tight as a drum.”

Andrew Brietbart, whose name should be the watchword for nasty fabrications, is also quoted in the Daily Caller piece. Given the way he launched himself to fame by lying his ass off about ACORN on Beck’s show, the irony may rip a small hole in the space-time continuum. While I’m amused as hell to see Beck take fire for this behavior, it’s sort of like having photoshop artists gripe about Weekly World News stealing their pictures of Batboy.

(I)f he was acting in a good faith manner, but the editing that he engaged in turned out to get her into trouble, then that would not be enough to demonstrate actual malice — which is what you have to demonstrate when you are a public official and you bring a libel suit. If, on the other hand, she can show that for his political reasons, his ideological reasons, his desire to make a name for himself, or whatever, that he purposely distorted what she said in a way that damaged her, then she might have a serious claim. (Emphasis mine)

As I keep saying, this is really about who edited the videos. At some point, a deposition will involve Andrew Breitbart answering this question. Because that is the answer to who defamed Shirley Sherrod; she deserves to know it. The editing was clearly intended to defame Sherrod, and the NAACP through her. Brietbart tasted blood early with ACORN, and liked it. He’s been trying to repeat that feeling ever since. He likes it.

Andrew Breitbart (pictured) is a known news fabricator. Any material originating through his websites should be considered suspect at best, and subjected to thorough fact-checking before it can be reported on by anyone in any case.

Legitimate bloggers should avoid linking to his websites. Bloggers and other new media content creators who work for Breitbart, or who post to his sites, should be considered fruit of a poisonous tree.

Breitbart himself should be considered unfit for news. If it is absolutely necessary to report on him, Breitbart should be identified primarily as “known fabricator” — not a ‘journalist,’ ‘entertainer,’ ‘website mogul,’ or any other such title.

HISTORY OF FABRICATION

Breitbart emerged in 2009 with the introduction of prank videos made by James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles in ACORN offices around the country. Said videos were selectively edited to create an appearance of improper conduct by ACORN staff. Breitbart participated in deception efforts, telling the Washington Times that O’Keefe had been dressed in a pimp costume when he visited ACORN offices. In fact, O’Keefe had never been dressed as a pimp in any ACORN office. Confronted at the 2010 CPAC Convention, Breitbart danced around the issue, calling O’Keefe’s costume “minutiae” despite how the entire narrative of the scandal revolved around it. Breitbart later confronted Max Blumenthal in what would prove to be a pattern of behavior under examination: Breitbart responds to exposure by attacking the motives of those who expose him.

This would be born out in his next big scandal. In 2010, Breitbart released a video of US Department of Agriculture employee Shirley Sherrod speaking about an encounter with a white farmer. The video had been closely edited to portray Sherrod as a racist. Sherrod was forced to resign her position. Within days, however, the full video emerged and it was clear to everyone that Brietbart’s video was a fabrication. Once again, Breitbart’s response was to attack the White House, the NAACP, and Shirley Sherrod. He continues to protect the source of the video while claiming the president and the White House are orchestrating a campaign against him.

Just before the midterm elections of 2010, Breitbart claimed with Sarah Palin that CBS affiliate KTVA had conspired to damage Tea Party Senate candidate Joe Miller. In fact, captured audio of a KTVA staff meeting at Breitbart’s website had been significantly edited to change the context. Station personnel had actually been gaming “what-if” scenarios for a Joe Miller rally.

This section may be expanded.

NEGATIVE ACTIONS

After controversy erupted over a decision to involve Breitbart in their 2010 midterm election coverage, Executive producer of ABC News Digital Andrew Morse dismissed him from the broadcast with the following email:

Dear Mr. Breitbart,

We have spent the past several days trying to make clear to you your limited role as a participant in our digital town hall to be streamed on ABCNews.com and Facebook.   The post on your blog last Friday created a widespread impression that you would be analyzing the election on ABC News.   We made it as clear as possible as quickly as possible that you had been invited along with numerous others to participate in our digital town hall.  Instead of clarifying your role, you posted a blog on Sunday evening in which you continued to claim a bigger role in our coverage.  As we are still unable to agree on your role, we feel it best for you not to participate.

To date, Sherrod and one ACORN employee have filed lawsuits over the videos. The Republican National Committee has canceled a fundraiser at which Breitbart was supposed to appear. (The event has since been rescheduled.) Baltimore Sun columnist Dan Rodricks wrote:

Had any producer at a local TV station, network or cable newsroom cobbled together a video like the one Mr. Breitbart posted of Ms. Sherrod, that producer would be among the nation’s unemployed today.

Nicole Sandler has signed.

GottaLaff has signed.

Ben Cohen has signed.

silvermaneman has signed.

Karoli has signed.

lsoderman has signed.

David Horton has signed.

Bob Kincaid has signed.

Michelle Oliver has signed.

Gary Blackmon has signed.

This section will be expanded.

Not only is Juan Carlos Vera’s behavior inconsistent with criminal habits, it screams of a desire to help two young people who seem to be in very deep trouble.

Nor should he be the least bit embarrassed by this video. In fact, everything embarrassing comes from Hannah and James. THEY are the ones who walked into this office with a crazy story about smuggling underage prostitutes from El Salvador. THEY are the ones reading intentions into the situation. NONE of this comes from Juan or the organization he worked for.

Having watched two videos, I have yet to see an ACORN employee break the law or offer to help O’Keefe and Giles break the law.

Mind you, I was merely paying attention to the same videos Breitbart put on his website. A full investigation of the unedited tapes by the California AG’s office vindicated Juan Carlos Vera, who is now suing Giles and O’Keefe:

On August 18, 2009, at approximately 5:00pm, Defendants O’Keefe and Giles visited the ACORN office in National City, California.

O’Keefe was wearing a hidden camera and recorded audio and video of the visit.

Defendants O’Keefe and Giles conspired to secretly video tape and audio tape Mr. Vera.

Defendants went into Mr. Vera’s office, sat down, and began a conversation.

O’Keefe and Giles asked whether the conversation would be kept confidential and Mr. Vera agreed.

I’m glad. I hope all of the victims sue them into oblivion — as well as Andrew Breitbart and FOX News, the New York Times, the Baltimore Sun, CNN, and every media outlet that replayed or reported on the videos without a critical eye or even a pretense of fact-checking. They should all be indicted for the high-tech lynching of an uppity black organization, but I’ll settle for the justice Juan Carlos Vera seeks.

And he should get justice. Despite having done everything right, including calling the police after they left his office, Juan Carlos Vera was fired as soon as his supervisor watched the selectively-edited video. Such “accomplishments” cannot go unpunished without incentivizing more of the same.

Just a few things that even liberal and progressive bloggers should try to remember:

1. O’Keefe was NEVER dressed like a pimp at any time in any ACORN office.
2. Hannah Giles told ACORN workers she was leaving an abusive pimp and needed housing before she mentioned any girls from El Salvador.
3. The first videos were the most highly-edited; the last revealed their con game, but the damage was done.
4. Giles and O’Keefe should not be referred to as “filmmakers” of “journalists.” They are neither.

“I use Google Alert for my name to start fights with people in comment sections or on Twitter. It’s clear that Keith Olbermann’s strategy to get noticed was to attack people above him. I have precisely the opposite strategy: to go after the mosquitoes that bite my ankles. I’m not sure it’s a good business model but I’m a petty enough man to indulge them.”

The truth is that Andrew Breitbart is as narcissistic as they come and has no better use for his time than picking fights with strangers on the internet. From a hagiographic WIRED article:

The filet finally shows and Breitbart digs in, ignoring the risk to his mustard-colored sports coat. “The idea is that I have to screw with media, and I have to screw with the Left, in order to give legitimate stories the ability to reach their natural watermark,” he says.

The “natural watermark” is subsumed in the trademark symbol I use in phrases like Teh Librul Media™ and Teh Stupid™ to indicate their origin within the paranoid universe of right-wing politics. But to call his nontroversies “legitimate” is the height of intellectual arrogance. White House Christmas ornaments, microcamera improv games, and Yosi Sergant all turn out to be more of the same OMG Global Socializams™ hysteria. It’s made worse by the wackaloon bloggers he uses.

Back in 1964, this C student would have been drummed out of the movement; his continued presence in the halls of conservative fellowship is a testament to just how far the American right has fallen. Breitbart is a case of diminished standards.

What? I’m gonna argue with you over Twitter? That’s makes a hell of a lot of sense — tough guy.

As I keep saying: DO NOT ENGAGE TEH CRAZY™! Backstory here.

Gaylord. Heh. Sumptuous digs for a "populist" movement.

Well, last night was interesting.

I needed to be in Nashville yesterday anyway, so I crashed the tea party at the Gaylord (heh!) Grand Ole Opry Hotel and Convention Center to catch as much video as possible. I went as a citizen journalist with every intention of promoting my work via Huffington Post in all probability, but in the form of You Tube video that will be available elsewhere (including, and especially, my own website).

I introduced myself as Matt Osborne to everyone who asked. No one asked if I was with a media organization, including the woman who eventually “threw me out,” until Sarah’s speech was over and I was literally leaving the way I’d come. I got silent video of convention participants and Judge Roy Moore of Ye Ten Commandments. I talked to “media colleagues” and got samples of the propaganda. Though I was refused entry to the ballroom to so much as take a photo of Sarah, I watched a little of her speech on somebody’s laptop.

After getting shots through the wide-open banquet hall doors, I proceeded to interview two participants off-camera for research purposes. I didn’t take quotes and continued introducing myself as Matt Osborne.

I say all of this as prologue to explain that I’m working on a video involving Andy Breitbart; I was hoping to run into him, but was more concerned with getting video to lay out the narrative of astroturfery and right-wing nontroversy. If you follow my posts at HuffPo or my blog, you know that these are very big areas of interest for me; they’re subjects on which Maddow has reported as well.

So just in case I ran into Breitbart, I had decided to adopt the O’Keefe method: I went under pretext. The best part is, I did not lie about these things, and still got plenty of video. As far as professional ethics go, I think I did pretty well. My girlfriend thought it would be fun to try and say she was a high school senior working on a report for her government class; she does in fact appear quite young, but she’s no professional. Nevertheless, it’s her camera.

As I said, I got GREAT video that will be ready later today (I hope), but I didn’t get to meet or see Breitbart. So I was on my way out the same way I came in (the back door leads to the Opry Mills Mall parking lot; the facility has 24-7 public access) when I was stopped by a woman who claimed to be the event’s media liaison.

She had the a sharp, angry tone of a harpy. Mind you, this woman had already caught sight of us and the camera shortly after we came in  and did nothing. When I now held out my hand and introduced myself as Matt Osborne, she asked me who I was with and I suddenly grew devil’s horns. Remember, I had already done what I’d come to do; just to find out what would happen, I said two words that may get me in real trouble:

“Huffington Post.”

I said that because (of course) Huffington Post is not a “real media organization” (while Breitbart, who borrowed the Huffington Post business model to spread demonstrable lies and paranoid racist agit-prop, was a central figure at the convention). Huffington Post alone does not get invited to the tea party. Wing Nut Daily is more “respectable.”

The harpy said I would have been treated like any other media organization if I had checked in with her, but I got VIDEO of their plan for me. No thanks — the media room was on the opposite end of the extremely large building, and reporters from other news agencies described an oppressive atmosphere.

Remember, I used public access. I took video of people already appearing on video. I didn’t tape or record interviews. As far as ethics are concerned, I’ll gladly compare mine to James O’Keefe any bloody day. Which must be why I grinned when the harpy said she should have expected as much, that HuffPo was an unprofessional outfit and I was the perfect example.

I tore a page out of the Breitbart-O’Keefe playbook and she called me “unprofessional.” Let that sink in.

Anyway: the harpy texted or tweeted someone. I did not have a press credential from HuffPo (I don’t think they have any, actually) so I began to explain that I am an unpaid blogger for Huffington Post…but she was already calling security as the words started coming out of my mouth.

The harpy said that I was to be detained and held for questioning, which was not about to happen for any number of reasons. It’s still the goddamn United States of America; I am not easily intimidated by civilians playing tinfoil god. I also found her highly offensive, so I just said “no” and turned to walk away.

Then the harpy followed me (she would follow me all the way to my car, she said). She attempted to taunt us (laughable) and hollered that we were in terrible trouble — which, in fact, we were; my girlfriend has breathing problems and was now having difficulty getting enough air.

When the harpy realized how I’d accessed the building, she took verbal offense that I had not paid $18 for self-parking. At that point I turned to her in an attempt at reconciliation; there were no grounds for arresting us, and my girlfriend was having a panic attack.

Which is the moment the harpy called the police. Irony: I was in a building full of people convinced the president was an illegitimate foreign agent bent on removing their constitutional rights.

We lost her and made a clean extraction, but there’s no video of all this — my girlfriend was so scared she thought she would drop the camera.

I will understand if Huffington Post is forced to disavow me. That’s fine; I’ll take whatever bad-boy punishment Arianna determines — and make no whimper of complaint under the lash. (Though it would be great to get some consideration from George Soros, who has yet to send me that check we’re all supposedly earning in the liberal ‘sphere.) The fact is, I haven’t made any money by being on HuffPo and that’s not what I blog there for.

The woman called herself an employee of Gaylord’s, but I have yet to confirm that and have reason to doubt it. More as this develops…

ADDING: She actually yelled a verbal no-trespass order for the entire convention center and the Opry Mills mall at my back. Boo f***ing wa wa hoo, I can’t drive two hours to pay a retail markup.

ALSO ADDING: Did you know that shutting a door is “assault?” I didn’t, until the harpy shouted this fact too. Interesting how adaptable definitions become whenever wingnuts get involved.

Also also Adding: Gaylord (heh). Turns out the great Nashvegas institution is a corporate welfare recipient.