Richard Shelby
Feb 5, 2010 Alabama Republicans, Barack Obama cabinet picks, Defense Procurement, Richard Shelby, alabama, republicans suck
I’ll give Jeff Sessions credit: he at least wrote back to me about his gang-rape vote. Richard Shelby, on the other hand, has yet to acknowledge the complaint. Now Shelby’s put an unprecedented “blanket hold” on 70 Obama nominees, and again refuses to explain himself:
The hold means no nominations can move forward unless Senate Democrats can secure a 60-member cloture vote to break it, or until Shelby lifts the hold.
And what, pray tell, does Shelby want to extort from the administration? The Mobile Press-Register reports:
- A $40 billion contract to build air-to-air refueling tankers. From CongressDaily: “Northrop/EADS team would build the planes in Mobile, Ala., but has threatened to pull out of the competition unless the Air Force makes changes to a draft request for proposals.” Federal Times offers more details on the tanker deal, and also confirms its connection to the hold.
- An improvised explosive device testing lab for the FBI. From CongressDaily: “[Shelby] is frustrated that the Obama administration won’t build” the center, which Shelby earmarked $45 million for in 2008. The center is due to be based “at the Army’s Redstone Arsenal.”
The story of the tanker planes is ridiculous. Northrop wants to team up with Airbus to build them in Alabama; rival Boeing wants to build them in Washington. Now Northrop wants the Air Force to change its criteria for selection or else it will take its football and go home. The second one is new to me, but just how bad is the problem of improvised explosive devices in the United States? Because I don’t see the FBI deploying to Pakistan anytime soon.
Maybe I’m wrong; maybe Northrop/EADS should have the contract and the FBI desperately needs this facility to be in Huntsville. Or maybe Shelby is just a pig at the trough in Washington taking “the party of no” to petty extremes. As I noted back in September amid the “czars” nontroversy, the GOP obstructionism is aimed at hampering Obama’s ability to govern. Effective leadership consists of delegation to competent subordinates; block the subordinates, and you block the leader. As of August, Obama still didn’t have half his team in place:
While career employees or holdovers fill many posts on a temporary basis, Mr. Obama does not have his own people enacting programs central to his mission. He is trying to fix the financial markets but does not have an assistant treasury secretary for financial markets. He is spending more money on transportation than anyone since Dwight D. Eisenhower but does not have his own inspector general watching how the dollars are used. He is fighting two wars but does not have an Army secretary.
He sent Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to Africa to talk about international development but does not have anyone running the Agency for International Development. He has invited major powers to a summit on nuclear nonproliferation but does not have an assistant secretary of state for nonproliferation.
All of which suits Shelby and the GOP just fine, I’m sure. After all, they were willing to block Obama’s nomination for head of the Transportation Security Administration just to keep the people at the x-ray machines from unionizing. The funny thing is, I remember when Shelby was the Democrat who unseated Denton by accusing him of overconsuming pork.
Parker Griffith: Good Riddance!
Dec 22, 2009 Alabama Republicans, Blue Dogs, Parker Griffith, The Teabag Terror
So my representative in Washington is switching from the Democratic Party to the Republicans? Shock!
I am SHOCKED, I say, that a man who pandered to teabaggers at health care town halls with Soylent Green death panels and immigration hysteria, openly advocated removing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and who boasts an impressive seven percent progressive rating versus a mere 33% conservative rating, has turned coat. Whodathunkit?
With Griffith, disingenuous politics are a given. He’s cut from the George Wallace mold. He can’t even be honest about his reasons: speaking to POLITICO, Griffith made the case that Obama’s cancellation of a missile shield was his proximate cause for the switch. Sure, the strategic choice of a sea-based system closer to Iran did take contracts away from Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, at the center of his district, and direct them to other states. But that was in September — why do this now?
More likely is the explanation that Griffith has never actually been a Democrat. He voted against the Lily Ledbetter Act, every version of health care reform, and the stimulus bill, while actively working against the union workers who put him over the top.
If the man is starting to sound like a closet Republican finally going home, then you’re getting the picture.
Griffith’s latest move is all about cutting off his right flank. He’s a first-term representative elected by a razor-thin margin over Republican Wayne Parker, a wingnut among wingnuts who (rumor has it) will run again.* In becoming the GOP incumbent, Griffith hopes to cut off his main opponent and face an empty Democratic field.
But good luck with that strategy in the age of Teabag Terror. Red State’s Eric Erickson has already declared him persona non grata:
We should now hope him [sic] be an extremely endangered Republican in a primary. We will not fix the GOP’s problems if we keep allowing people who are not one of us to suddenly switch the letter next to their name and magically become one of us.
How ironic, how deeply delicious, would it be to see Griffith embrace the Teabag Terror only to get crushed? That vision is all the sweeter when you realize that Griffith’s politics have never been those of a Democrat or even a Republican.
Griffith has always been about Griffith.
It’s in the way this oncologist speaks of tort reform as a magic silver bullet to solve the health care crisis. It’s plainly etched in the career path of a doctor who made his sizable fortune by embracing the trend towards patients-as-profit-centers. It’s in the spectacle of Griffith throwing red meat at Norton Auditorium in August.
It’s in his embrace of the party that paid for this disgusting ad used against him (h/t to GottaLaff):
*UPDATE: Apparently my information on other GOP candidates is out-of-date. From POLITICO:
Madison County Commissioner Mo Brooks will be remaining in the race, according to his campaign manager Bruce Tucker, who called Griffith’s party switch “a desperate political move.”
Also, the Rush Limbaugh of Huntsville has spoken:
“He’s a liar. Michael Steele should be ashamed of himself. The NRCC should be ashamed of itself for not coming out and immediately repudiating this guy. He was unacceptable a year ago and he’s acceptable now? A year ago, they were saying this guy was a murderer.”
Teabaggers are so predictable. Too bad Griffith couldn’t predict their rejection.
209 Pages
Nov 25, 2009 Alabama Republicans, alabama, alabama constitutional reform, health care reform
Really, I just want to see Artur Davis hammer Roy Moore with this in a debate next year. Alabama’s Republicans think that gigantic, Jim Crow-era document is just fine, what with all its regressive taxation and corporate loopholes. But when you’re reforming one-sixth of the American economy, 209 detailed pages are unacceptable?
The Strange Story of Guy Hunt
Jan 31, 2009 Alabama Republicans, Alabama politics, Civil War and Reconstruction, George Wallace, Guy Hunt, racism in politics, southern apologists, southern politics
Today in Alabama, newspaper stories center on his uniqueness as the first Republican to be elected governor of Alabama since Civil War Reconstruction. National notices are, of course, minimal. And that’s a shame, because the curious career of Governor Hunt is an illumination of the history of conservative politics in America. The story of his rise is the story of the Republicans’ “Southern Strategy,” and the 12-year tide of southern conservative dominance in Washington, written in miniature. His downfall was the result of citizen action, and a kind of “legacy project” is determined to pass his life into the realm of permanent victimhood.
Hunt was never expected to win the 1986 governor’s race. Despite having helped put Ronald Reagan in office twice, Alabama was still a one-party state in the Democratic fold. George Wallace had effectively been governor for a generation, even when he wasn’t in office. This was, after all, the man who once ran his wife for the office when a new state law forbid him to run again.
The 1978 governor’s race had seen his hand-picked candidate Fob James handily defeat Guy Hunt in a racially-charged atmosphere. Wallace spent the next four years as the power behind the throne, and in the wake of that election he decided to leave a different legacy. So after shoving the hapless Fob James aside in 1982, Wallace won his final term as governor and promptly began opening up Alabama government to blacks at a faster rate than most northern states.
In 1985, the entire state waited to see if the wheelchair-bound elder statesman wanted a fifth term in office. I vividly remember my 8th-grade civics teacher waxing philosophical about it. He was a proud Republican, but even he did not have Guy Hunt on his radar. No one did. Wallace’s decision to retire was a shock that left the Alabama Democratic Party wondering what to do next.
The newspaper carried headlines about the Democratic race almost every day in 1986, but carried Hunt’s primary win in a sidebar capsule. For in Alabama, the Democratic Primary was the general election. The Republican candidate was a kind of sacrificial lamb whose inevitable defeat enshrined Democratic dominance. This arrangement served as a symbolic victory over the outcome of the Civil War and a rejection of post-war Reconstruction.
For until 1986, the Republican Party was still the party of Lincoln. Despite the Civil Rights Era, the Montgomery bus boycott, and the consequent infusion of African-Americans into the Democratic Party, this southern mythology had a life of its own. Thus the irony of the Republicans’ southern strategy: in order to take the south, they first had to end this ritual defeat of their party. The Democrats that year could not have been more helpful.
Two candidates squared off for the nomination. Each represented the last of a Democratic breed, and both were members of the Wallace entourage, but they could not have been more different.
As state Attorney General, Bill Baxley had convicted Robert Chambliss of the infamous 1963 Birmingham church bombing despite an all-white jury. When the Ku Klux Klan called him an “honorary nigger” and wished him to share the fate of John F. Kennedy, Baxley replied on official state letterhead: “My response to your letter of February 19, 1976, is – kiss my ass. Sincerely, Bill Baxley, Attorney General.”
Baxley, who never shied away from being identified as a southern liberal, lost a close primary to conservative DINO Charles Graddick. (When the GOP swept to power in Washington in the mid 1990s, Graddick — like almost all DINOs across the south — switched parties, becoming an unrepentant Republican.) While race was never an open subject, it was an open sore, and Graddick adopted the coded rhetoric Wallace had invented and Reagan had lately perfected. By framing Baxley as a ‘liberal,’ Graddick didn’t actually say ‘nigger-lover,’ but certainly meant it. Wallace’s racist base responded by voting for him.
Baxley sued, claiming Graddick had cheated by encouraging Republicans to vote in the Democrats’ primary. Of course, Alabama allows cross-over voting, but the party chose to set aside the popular vote anyway. Graddick began a write-in campaign, handing out thousands of pencils at rallies and running campaign commercials that showed voters where to write in his name on their ballots. Baxley found himself defending his flank instead of focusing on the general election, and the Democrats descended into self-parody.
Riding a wave of disgust with the Democrats — real or DINO — Guy Hunt became the first Republican elected governor of Alabama since the Reconstruction era. It wasn’t that Hunt was a particularly attractive candidate; in today’s terminology, Hunt was a paleo-Republican — an anti-science, Bible-thumping member of the Council of Conservative Citizens. (Get it? CCC=KKK). He also had a history of self-dealing: Reagan had appointed him to a seat on a Department of Agriculture agency, and by 1985 he had been forced to resign or face prosecution for mismanagement of funds. Indeed, his presence would never have been tolerated on a dominant-party ticket, but none of this made a dent in his sudden popularity. Alabama knew nothing about him, and didn’t really want to know.
His coalition was substantial, and he led it with crafted charisma. As a traveling Primitive Baptist preacher, Hunt appealed to the evangelical movement. As a member of the CCC, he appealed to white racists. As a Reaganite, he appealed to Reagan Democrats. A hobby farmer, Hunt had the aw-shucks demeanor of a good-old-boy grafted onto the slick salesmanship of an Amway salesman, which he was.
Nor can we leave out the story of his reelection. Hunt faced Paul Hubbert, head of the teacher’s union, the state’s most powerful lobbyist, and co-chair of the Alabama Democratic Party. For decades, stories have circulated about Hubbert’s god-like influence on the state legislature; he is a Democrat that even Democrats love to hate. Hunt won handily.
But after 1990, cracks began to form in the foundations of the Guy Hunt phenomenon. A long series of faux pas had worn away the charisma. News reports began to circulate: Hunt had been using state travel resources, including an airplane, to attend Primitive Baptist events across the south. While preaching at these revivals and meetings, hats and plates had been passed and bundles of cash had been offered to the governor. He was effectively violating state ethics laws by using state resources to enrich himself.
Flush with campaign cash after his reelection, Hunt formed a 501(c)3 corporation with the ostensible purpose of using leftover contributions for state charitable purposes. But instead of using those monies in legally-appointed ways, Hunt bought himself a new tractor, paid his mortgage, and bought furniture for family members. He had also developed a reputation for paranoia, insular secrecy, and high-handed behavior that resonates with the Bush years; while attending governors’ conferences, he had the largest bodyguard entourage of any governor. When questioned, he peevishly claimed the seven or eight state troopers surrounding him were a necessary protection. Against what, he refused to say.
The beginning of the end came in 1991, when Hunt visited the northwestern city of Florence to dedicate a civic boondoggle known as the Renaissance Tower. After his speech, Hunt clambered down a cardboard walkway and responded to a reporter’s question about his ethical lapses with angry denial — not of the lapses, but of the reporter’s right to ask him about them.
Standing nearby was a local citizen named John Crowder. Offended by the governor’s response, Crowder looked up the head of the Alabama Ethics Commission to ask why the AEC had done nothing about Guy Hunt. When he learned that the AEC is unable to bring any actions of its own, but instead must receive a request for action from a citizen of the state, Crowder asked for the commission’s mailing address. The letter he sent would start an avalanche of litigation.
Hunt was convicted by a jury in 1992. Since state laws require anyone convicted of a felony to resign, Hunt was forced from office. Immediately, Republicans in the legislature — and there was a new flood of them, for Hunt had broken the dam — leapt to his defense, claiming that he ‘had not done anything that everyone else didn’t do.’
This silly defense — ‘everyone does it’ — has become the basis of the Guy Hunt legend. Just as the southern mind has turned the Civil War defeat into a noble victory, Hunt has engineered a correction of the public record. His defenders have made him into a martyr of partisan politics ever since the jury’s verdict:
The most controversial element in the verdict may have come from the judge’s instructions to jurors that “the use of excess campaign funds for direct personal gain” is not lawful.Angry Republican legislators said that set a standard that was not in the law and not regularly observed. Those instructions are certain to be a critical element of Mr. Hunt’s appeal.
“No one has ever found that or anything close to it in the ethics law,” said State Representative Kerry Rich, a Republican from Arab. “He pulled it out of the clear blue sky. This was a total miscarriage of justice. Total.” (Emphasis mine)
Given that pardons are only granted on the admission of a crime, and that there can be no such thing as a crimeless victim, Hunt’s strange career ends with a disturbing cover-up framed by his defenders and enabled by the media. His sad death from lung cancer is no justification for rewriting history, but continues a tradition going back to the days of defeat in the War of Southern Aggression.
Hunt’s true legacy is in the Republican takeover of the south. It is in the redness of this region amidst a sea of blue last November. It is the defection of rural, white racists to the Republican party while declaring that the Democrats left them, and not the other way around. It is the know-nothing popularity of Sarah Palin, the Rovian secrecy of Bush, and the deliberate creation of a false “legacy.” Hunt’s story is Republicanism in miniature.

