Lost Cause Mythology

John Meacham offers a very perceptive take on the confederate history flap in Virginia as the latest episode in conservative “Lost Cause” mythology:

They would like what Lincoln called our “fiery trial” to be seen in a political, not a moral, light. If the slaves are erased from the picture, then what took place between Sumter and Appomattox is not about the fate of human chattel, or a battle between good and evil. It is, instead, more of an ancestral skirmish in the Reagan revolution, a contest between big and small government. (Emphasis mine)

That is exactly right. As someone who grew up in the south, I can testify this narrative was in place by 1978. It’s exactly what Reagan was speaking to when he talked up “states’ rights” in Philadelphia, Mississippi to declare his run for president. By 1986, lunchroom debate held that slavery was a “minor issue” in sparking the Civil War — but there would not have been a Civil War without that “peculiar institution.”

This continuing attempt to divorce the Civil War from its primary cause has been going on since before the south lost. It is the launching point for almost all the right-wing’s historical revisionism.

About Matt Osborne

Veteran blogging the culture wars from Alabama. Video journalist, mash-up artist, aspiring novelist, and metalhead. Expect bunnies, geekery, dark humor, and snarky empirical analysis to annoy idealists of all stripes. You can follow me on Twitter, but be ready 'cause it might get loud.
This entry was posted in Lost Cause mythology. Bookmark the permalink.
  • tnlib

    Great minds . . . dah-de-dah. Getting ready to post on this as well. Will link to you.

  • http://www.killiansaid.blogspot.com/ Citizen K.

    I'm a southerner as well. You and I both know that some people there will deny your point until hell freezes over. I guess the only thing we can do is call the McDonnell's of the world on their b.s. and trust in time. Like MLK said, the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. You might like this blog entry I wrote last month:

    http://killiansaid.blogspot.com/2010/03/whats-i...

  • http://www.osborneink.com/2012/02/glenn-greenwald-hates-the-constitution.html Osborne Ink » Glenn Greenwald Hates the Constitution

    [...] Many Southerners insist to this day that every confederate killed at Shiloh was the victim of a due-process free ‘targeted assassination’ — meaning that Union soldiers aimed their rifles rather than point them in random directions before pulling the trigger. That whole Civil War thing was illegal, too, because state’s rights! And it totally wasn’t about slavery (except that it totally was). [...]