No Democrats Left To Whip

The Consumer Finance Protection Agency seems to be joining the public option as a reform that is supposedly dead. Arianna Huffington summarizes the progressive view (emphasis mine):

On Saturday, Dodd told Bloomberg Television’s Al Hunt that he prefers an independent agency, but said it might not be possible to reach the 60 votes needed to break the inevitable Republican filibuster.

Maybe so. But how about at least trying before waving the white flag? Instead, Dodd, in the hope of attracting Republican votes, appears to have preemptively surrendered. But there’s no evidence that Dodd’s concession has achieved anything other than kneecapping the bill. Democrats have mastered the art of negotiating against themselves.

I’d have to counter that with exactly sixty Democrats in the Senate, the GOP’s obstructionism left the Democrat-on-Democrat conversation as the only way to move legislation forward in the Senate. That situation gave the Blue Dogs the power of a swing vote. With the election of Scott Brown, cloture requires at least one Republican vote. There are simply no Democrats left to whip. Which brings me to Nate Silver’s excellent chart:

Obama hasn’t been able to push reform through like FDR because he doesn’t have FDR’s majority. He doesn’t even have LBJ’s majority. Perhaps the answer, then, is to stop letting the GOP filibuster omnibus bills and force them to block lots of smaller reform bills instead — as Harry Reid has done with jobs bills. If Blue Dogs and Republicans want to side with banks and credit cards over consumers live on C-SPAN, let them.

About Matt Osborne

Veteran blogging the culture wars from Alabama. Video journalist, mash-up artist, aspiring novelist, and metalhead. Expect bunnies, geekery, dark humor, and snarky empirical analysis to annoy idealists of all stripes. You can follow me on Twitter, but be ready 'cause it might get loud.
This entry was posted in 11-Dimensional Chess, Financial Reform, public option. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/hi_hi_hi_hi_hi hi hi

    Yeah, that kind of “He should be more like FDR!” whining is really difficult to listen to. This is the problem with historical comparisons in general: focus in on a few similarities while ignoring the vast universe of differences.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1932prescount...

    That's the county-by-county electoral map for the 1932 presidential race. Notice anything funny? Like, for instance, the fact that the WHOLE SOUTH is deep, deep blue. Not a single county went to Hoover in all of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. The United States of 1932 would be like a strange foreign country to most Americans living today.

    You can't just “twist some arms” to get that kind of near-total consensus behind you. It takes a major historical event outside anyone's control–like the Great Depression–to push that many people all in the same direction.

    Obama didn't decide to have a thin Democratic majority in Congress, We the People® did.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    Well said!