Last Stands and the Public Option

Ryan Grim describes the prospect of a public option via reconciliation as a “last stand.” I resubmit that this was always inevitable; that its introduction to the Senate Bill process by Harry Reid was an indication that it could pass via reconciliation.

The 60th vote for a public option was never, ever there. That is also an indisputable fact. Nothing less than blackmail video of Joe Lieberman eating a baby was ever going to convince him to vote for it in the Senate bill.

It is true that Harry Reid might have started a whip count immediately, but why advertise your intentions? It is true that someone might have attempted to twist Joe’s arm, but to what end? Do not forget that this is only the first of three big reform projects in Obama’s first term. To that end, showing a willingness and ability to patiently persist and win is crucial to breaking the Party of No.

Pelosi will now pass the Senate Bill. The Senate has more than fifty votes for fixes and potentially more than fifty votes for a public option via reconciliation rules. This is a situation created by the minority and the “moderates” of the Senate — not Harry Reid, Rahm Emanuel, or Barack Obama. It’s simple arithmetic.

The president’s job now is to whip up popularity for the bill. The project of reforming health coverage will be as strong as we make it; he’s constitutionally incapable of directing this. But if he winds up with a total reform package that looks almost exactly like the one he proposed at the beginning of all this, then don’t tell me it’s an accident or that this White House doesn’t understand how to play chess.

Boy, today has brought me lots of redemption. Bring it, firebaggers! Tell me how this is the selling-out of reform.

About Matt Osborne

Veteran blogging the culture wars from Alabama. Video journalist, mash-up artist, aspiring novelist, and metalhead. Expect bunnies, geekery, dark humor, and snarky empirical analysis to annoy idealists of all stripes. You can follow me on Twitter, but be ready 'cause it might get loud.
This entry was posted in 11-Dimensional Chess, health care reform, public option. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jerrycritter

    Instead of all this BS that we have been through for over a year, they just should have passed Medicare For All by reconciliation and been done with it. Of course that would have required politicians who were more concerned about their constituents that their corporate overlords.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    Jerry, if they're struggling to whip 50 votes for a public option what makes you think there are 50 votes for single-payer? Yes, lobbyists have a lot of power — but it doesn't hurt their cause that the minority party has a strategy of obstruction and exactly enough seats in the Senate to empower “Democrats” like Lieberman. In an ideal world, we'd all have awesome single-payer health care. Instead, we have this massive, complex, inefficient system that no one actually designed, and overhauling it is a messy process.