The Art of Reversal

Sure, Obama might have just issued an executive order and done away with DADT with a pen-stroke. But rather than set himself against the Pentagon, Obama decided to utilize the chain of command to strengthen the case for a reversal of the statute. That’s classic consensus politics adapted for the reality of military culture, and yesterday brought the genius of the strategy into sharp focus.

No one in the military outranks Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Yesterday he told a Senate committee the Pentagon will spend the next year studying how to end the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. Defense Secretary Robert Gates seconded. Republicans on the committee responded with immediate resistance — and that is the point.

The optics of the issue are a complete contrast to 1993. Instead of attempted fiat, the White House has Republicans disagreeing with generals. At Huffington Post, Jason Linkins offers a roundup of past quotes from John McCain, who consistently maintained he would follow the military’s lead on DADT only to reverse himself yesterday:

Get that? Republicans are now in the position of second-guessing the military. This trend was visible as early as June of 2009. I once despaired over Obama’s choice of a Republican for Defense Secretary because I thought it fed into the (utterly false!) right-wing narrative that Democrats can’t run the Pentagon. But Gates has been a solid team player, especially on this issue, and now we have a significant cultural reversal — one that Steve Benen of the Washington Monthly website recognizes this morning, too.

There will be complaints from the left. Why wait a year? Well, it’s far less time than most weapons procurement decisions; and the policy has been in place for 17 years. Meanwhile, the armed forces are softening enforcement. Knowing the military culture, it will take at least a year for the brass to formulate the new policy; but the military always prefers to write its own policies because the needs of unit commanders are different from the political desires of elected politicians. They always respond to strong leadership, however, and Obama has been a stronger CIC than most people realize.

Of course, in the meantime there will be viral emails from armchair generals and veterans of previous conflicts. There will be ideologues demanding respect with their combat credentials in the lede. With respect, I look forward to smashing their stupid.

Adding: over at Stark Reports, Mike has some great interviews, including a voice-only quote from serial liar Jeff Sessions who was “visibly discomfited” by the topic.

Also adding: I’ve been linked by Wolfrum, who is a cool human being. Go give him some traffic.

About Matt Osborne

Veteran blogging the culture wars from Alabama. Video journalist, mash-up artist, aspiring novelist, and metalhead. Expect bunnies, geekery, dark humor, and snarky empirical analysis to annoy idealists of all stripes. You can follow me on Twitter, but be ready 'cause it might get loud.
This entry was posted in 11-Dimensional Chess, DADT, Jeff Sessions, John McCain, Obama postelection strategy, military, republicans suck. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Robert Shaub

    I was one of the people disappointed with the slow pace of the removal of DADT. But after reading your entry I see the wisdom of letting the military do it in their own way. To have the Republicans disagreeing with the military leadership is a great bonus. Obama takes a hands off approach and placates the military, while the Republican conservatives start fighting with them. A potential win/win for Obama.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    Engineering win/win scenarios is the test of consensus politics.

  • http://www.williamkwolfrum.com/2010/02/03/blogroll-amnesty-day-smaller-blogs-should-not-be-allowed-to-serve-in-the-u-s-military-or-marry/ Blogroll Amnesty Day: Smaller Blogs should not be allowed to serve in the U.S. Military or marry : William K. Wolfrum Chronicles

    [...] This brings me to my main point: Under no circumstances should we allow small bloggers to either serve in the U.S. military or get married. The very fabric of our society is at stake, people, and I for one will not sit idly [...]

  • Jennifer

    I was just re-reading a passage in Plouffe's book the other day that basically said part of the change Obama wanted to bring was that of patience and long-term thinking. We are so impatient and anxious as a society that too many people can't see that repealing DADT, among many other necessary policy changes, must be done in the most thorough way possible or they are set up to flip back later. As much as I adore the President, I never was one to think he'd be quick. His pacing and level-headedness are two of the reasons I campaigned and voted for him.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    It's always funny to me how some rabid lefties want Obama to keep his campaign promise to change the way Washington works, and at the first sign of disappointment they demand Obama engage in Beltway strong-arming.

  • Jennifer

    Exactly. And they seem to forget his red states/blue states speech. I admit I get pretty antagonistic toward Republicans but I do TRY to remember that not all Republicans are bad. We really should follow his lead more often.