<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Getting Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html</link>
	<description>News that&#039;s fairly liberal, but never unbalanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Osborne</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html/comment-page-1#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 02:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=725#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Anonymous comments are da bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Anonymous comments are da bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=725#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt. I usually agree with your sentiments on Bob Cesca&#039;s website. Annette and yourself seem like the most sanest of commentors over there. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the continuing confidence and positive information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Da Bomb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt. I usually agree with your sentiments on Bob Cesca&#39;s website. Annette and yourself seem like the most sanest of commentors over there. </p>
<p>Thanks for the continuing confidence and positive information.</p>
<p>- Da Bomb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Osborne</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html/comment-page-1#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=725#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Annette! I think Obama&#039;s going with the &quot;five&quot; option in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Annette! I think Obama&#39;s going with the &quot;five&quot; option in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette</title>
		<link>http://www.osborneink.com/2009/08/youre-getting-reform.html/comment-page-1#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.osborneink.com/?p=725#comment-604</guid>
		<description>I concur with your assessment sir...and have laid out a similar scenario.. please read mine and see what I have come up with.. If they take a bill to a vote, they already have a committed 45 votes in the Senate..all they would need is at the least 5 more and at the most 16 and I think they could get those..with a little push and that&#039;s what we need Dodd and Kerry and Rockefeller to do now. Push and Prod a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your assessment sir&#8230;and have laid out a similar scenario.. please read mine and see what I have come up with.. If they take a bill to a vote, they already have a committed 45 votes in the Senate..all they would need is at the least 5 more and at the most 16 and I think they could get those..with a little push and that&#39;s what we need Dodd and Kerry and Rockefeller to do now. Push and Prod a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

